Perceived Barriers to Blood Flow Restriction Training
2021
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick · First author
Abstract
Blood flow restriction (BFR) training is increasing in popularity in the fitness and rehabilitation settings due to its role in optimizing muscle mass and strength as well as cardiovascular capacity, function, and a host of other benefits. However, despite the interest in this area of research, there are likely some perceived barriers that practitioners must overcome to effectively implement this modality into practice. These barriers include determining BFR training pressures, access to appropriate BFR training technologies for relevant demographics based on the current evidence, a comprehensive and systematic approach to medical screening for safe practice and strategies to mitigate excessive perceptual demands of BFR training to foster long-term compliance. This manuscript attempts to discuss each of these barriers and provides evidence-based strategies and direction to guide clinical practice and future research.
Authors
Rolnick N, Kimbrell K, Cerqueira M, Weatherford B, Brandner C
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick’s contribution: First author
Read the full paper
Cite this paper
Rolnick N, Kimbrell K, Cerqueira M, Weatherford B, Brandner C. (2021). Perceived Barriers to Blood Flow Restriction Training. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.697082
Related research
More from this line of work
Letter / commentary · 2021
Comparison of Blood Flow Restriction Devices and Their Effect on Quadriceps Muscle Activation: Letter to the Editor
Read the record
Letter / commentary · 2021
Letter to the editor concerning the article: The effectiveness of blood-flow restricted resistance training in the musculoskeletal rehabilitation of patients with lower limb disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Read the record
Journal article · 2022
A Useful Blood Flow Restriction Training Risk Stratification for Exercise and Rehabilitation
Read the record
Apply the research
From the paper to the patient
Every protocol in The Complete BFR Certification cites the literature it came from, including this line of work. The module-by-module bibliography (Bonus 5) maps each claim back to its paper.

