Challenges in upright limb occlusion pressure determination with the Delfi PTS: pilot data from two independent cohorts
Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025 · Vol 7 · 1686040
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick · First author
Abstract
Purpose. Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise prescription relies on accurate determination of limb occlusion pressure (LOP), which is known to vary by body position. While recent guidelines suggest assessing LOP in the same position as the intended exercise, the feasibility of upright LOP assessment remains uncertain.
Methods. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of seated and standing LOP assessment using the Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System (PTS) under multiple postural and cueing conditions. Two separate and independent cohorts (n = 11 each; 18-35 years old) completed three experimental conditions involving either equal weightbearing (with/without visual cueing), seated, or wall-supported standing, with force plates used to monitor weight distribution. LOP was measured on two separate days using manufacturer guidelines. In each condition, three assessments were performed (n = 66 measurements per experimental condition).
Results. LOP was unable to be determined in enough participants within and between cohorts to be able to compare reliability of LOP measured between conditions. Therefore, Cochran's Q test revealed no significant differences in successful LOP detection across conditions in cohort 1 (p = 0.234) but did reveal differences in conditions 1 and 3 (p < 0.001) and between 2 and 3 (p = 0.001) in cohort 2. Overall, we were successful in measuring LOP in 28.7% of the total attempts (57/198) in Cohort 1 and 34.8% (69/198) of the total attempts in Cohort 2. Seated LOP assessment was most successfully measured (34/66 attempts, 51%).
Conclusion. Seated and standing LOP assessment using the Delfi PTS appears largely unfeasible, regardless of cueing or postural modifications. These findings question the feasibility of implementing seated or standing LOP measurements using the Delfi PTS in research and practice and suggest that future BFR research and application may benefit from supine LOP determination, or from developing dynamic calibration protocols suited for upright exercise.
Authors
Nicholas Rolnick, Victor S de Queiros, Campbell Ruffhead, Sean Richard Zupnik, Michael Sergio, Lucas Kuriawa, Tim Werner
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick’s contribution: First author
Keywords
- BFR training
- arterial occlusion pressure
- blood flow restriction
- pilot study
- postural influence
- reliability
Read the full paper
Cite this paper
Nicholas Rolnick, Victor S de Queiros, Campbell Ruffhead, Sean Richard Zupnik, Michael Sergio, Lucas Kuriawa, Tim Werner. (2025). Challenges in upright limb occlusion pressure determination with the Delfi PTS: pilot data from two independent cohorts. Frontiers in sports and active living, 7, 1686040. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1686040
Related research
More from this line of work
Journal article · 2026
Autoregulation during blood flow restricted exercise offers no additional benefit on thigh muscle hypertrophy and strength adaptations in trained participants: a randomized within-subject 8-week trial
Read the record
Letter / commentary · 2024
Commentary: Effects of occlusion pressure on hemodynamic responses recorded by near-infrared spectroscopy across two visits
Read the record
Journal article · 2024
Impact of limb occlusion pressure assessment position on performance, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses in blood flow restricted low-load resistance exercise: A randomized crossover trial
Read the record
Apply the research
From the paper to the patient
Every protocol in The Complete BFR Certification cites the literature it came from, including this line of work. The module-by-module bibliography (Bonus 5) maps each claim back to its paper.

