Blood flow restriction training compared to conventional training in people with knee pain: Letter to Editor
Physical therapy in sport · 2026 · Vol 78 · 101893
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick · Co-author
About this publication
"Blood flow restriction training compared to conventional training in people with knee pain: Letter to Editor" is a letter to the editor published in Physical therapy in sport (2026). A full abstract is not available for this entry in open databases; the complete record is available through the links below.
Citation-only entry. Letter / commentary abstracts of this kind are often not posted to open databases; the full record is linked below.
Authors
João Vitor Ferlito, Nicholas Rolnick
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick’s contribution: Co-author
Read the full paper
Cite this paper
João Vitor Ferlito, Nicholas Rolnick. (2026). Blood flow restriction training compared to conventional training in people with knee pain: Letter to Editor. Physical therapy in sport, 78, 101893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2026.101893
Related research
More from this line of work
Journal article · 2026
A debate on the necessity, practicality, and importance of arterial occlusion pressure usage in blood flow restriction research and practice: a point-counterpoint discussion
Read the record
Letter / commentary · 2026
Are we comparing blood flow restriction outcomes using equivalent equipment? The importance of empirically validated equipment and accurate reporting for comparison of outcomes related to safety and efficacy
Read the record
Journal article · 2026
Autoregulation during blood flow restricted exercise offers no additional benefit on thigh muscle hypertrophy and strength adaptations in trained participants: a randomized within-subject 8-week trial
Read the record
Apply the research
From the paper to the patient
Every protocol in The Complete BFR Certification cites the literature it came from, including this line of work. The module-by-module bibliography (Bonus 5) maps each claim back to its paper.