Uniform Neuromuscular Responses Across Varied Blood Flow Restriction Training Strategies
Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2026 · Vol 40(3) · 304-310
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick · Co-author
Abstract
Howard, MA, Rivera, PM, Lubiak, SM, Proppe, CE, Schmidt, JT, Rolnick, N, Shobe, ED, Fraifer, TL, and Hill, EC. Uniform neuromuscular responses across varied blood flow restriction training strategies. J Strength Cond Res 40(3): 304-310, 2026-The purpose of this investigation was to assess neuromuscular responses during acute bouts of resistance exercise with low-load blood flow restriction (LLBFR) performed with a 75-repetition protocol (75-rep; 1 × 30, 3 × 15), 3 sets to failure (3×), and 1 set to failure (1×). Seventeen recreationally active females randomly completed 75-rep, 3×, and 1× protocols consisting of unilateral, submaximal (30% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction), isokinetic (90°·s -1 ), leg extension muscle actions. A greater number of repetitions were performed during set 1 of the 1× protocol (59.5 ± 35.1) compared with the 75-rep protocol (30.0 ± 0.0), and more total repetitions were performed in the 3× protocol (85.2 ± 42.2) compared with the 1× protocol (59.5 ± 35.1). Surface electromyographic (sEMG) amplitude (AMP) progressively increased and then plateaued after 2 sets for the 75-rep protocol (118.3 ± 31.4% to 185.9 ± 85.3%; p = 0.043) and after 1 set of the 3× protocol (119.6 ± 8.6% to 206.3 ± 84.1%; p = 0.003). In addition, sEMG mean power frequency (MPF) decreased and then plateaued after 3 sets of the 75-rep protocol (99.8 ± 3.5% to 88.8 ± 11.7%; p = 0.012) and after 1 set of the 3× protocol (101.0 ± 8.2% to 84.4 ± 18.9%; p < 0.001). The changes in sEMG AMP and sEMG MPF across multiple sets (i.e., 75-rep and 3×) never exceeded the changes observed after the 1× protocol. Despite variations in set and repetition schemes, performing just 1 set of LLBFR to failure was sufficient to maximize acute neuromuscular responses. This highlights the efficiency of a single-set LLBFR protocol as a time-effective option for athletes and practitioners.
Authors
Mason A Howard, Paola M Rivera, Sean M Lubiak, Christopher E Proppe, Jeffrey T Schmidt, Nicholas Rolnick, Ezra D Shobe, Thaila L Fraifer, Ethan C Hill
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick’s contribution: Co-author
Keywords
- BFR
- exercise
- neuromuscular fatigue
- occlusion
Read the full paper
Cite this paper
Mason A Howard, Paola M Rivera, Sean M Lubiak, Christopher E Proppe, Jeffrey T Schmidt, Nicholas Rolnick, Ezra D Shobe, Thaila L Fraifer, Ethan C Hill. (2026). Uniform Neuromuscular Responses Across Varied Blood Flow Restriction Training Strategies. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 40(3), 304-310. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005311
Related research
More from this line of work
Journal article · 2025
Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Strength and Functionality in People With Knee Arthropathies: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Read the record
Journal article · 2025
Evaluating the effectiveness of blood flow restriction training in older adults: An overview of systematic reviews
Read the record
Journal article · 2023
Fiber-Type-Specific Hypertrophy with the Use of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training: A Systematic Review
Read the record
Apply the research
From the paper to the patient
Every protocol in The Complete BFR Certification cites the literature it came from, including this line of work. The module-by-module bibliography (Bonus 5) maps each claim back to its paper.

