Current Implementation and Barriers to Using Blood Flow Restriction Training: Insights From a Survey of Allied Health Practitioners
Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2023 · Vol 38(3) · 481-490
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick · Co-author
Abstract
Scott, BR, Marston, KJ, Owens, J, Rolnick, N, and Patterson, SD. Current implementation and barriers to using blood flow restriction training: Insights from a survey of allied health practitioners. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): 481-490, 2024-This study investigated the use of blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise by practitioners working specifically with clinical or older populations, and the barriers preventing some practitioners from prescribing BFR. An online survey was disseminated globally to allied health practitioners, with data from 397 responders included in analyses. Responders who had prescribed BFR exercise ( n = 308) completed questions about how they implement this technique. Those who had not prescribed BFR exercise ( n = 89) provided information on barriers to using this technique, and a subset of these responders ( n = 22) completed a follow-up survey to investigate how these barriers could be alleviated. Most practitioners prescribe BFR exercise for musculoskeletal rehabilitation clients (91.6%), with the BFR cuff pressure typically relative to arterial occlusion pressure (81.1%) and implemented with resistance (96.8%) or aerobic exercise (42.9%). Most practitioners screen for contraindications (68.2%), although minor side effects, including muscle soreness (65.8%), are common. The main barriers preventing some practitioners from using BFR are lack of equipment (60.2%), insufficient education (55.7%), and safety concerns (31.8%). Suggestions to alleviate these barriers included developing educational resources about the safe application and benefits of BFR exercise ( n = 20) that are affordable ( n = 3) and convenient ( n = 4). These results indicate that BFR prescription for clinical and older cohorts mainly conforms with current guidelines, which is important considering the potentially increased risk for adverse events in these cohorts. However, barriers still prevent broader utility of BFR training, although some may be alleviated through well-developed educational offerings to train practitioners in using BFR exercise.
Authors
Brendan R Scott, Kieran J Marston, Johnny Owens, Nicholas Rolnick, Stephen D Patterson
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick’s contribution: Co-author
Read the full paper
Cite this paper
Brendan R Scott, Kieran J Marston, Johnny Owens, Nicholas Rolnick, Stephen D Patterson. (2023). Current Implementation and Barriers to Using Blood Flow Restriction Training: Insights From a Survey of Allied Health Practitioners. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 38(3), 481-490. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004656
Related research
More from this line of work
Journal article · 2023
Acute Central Stiffness and Muscle Morphological Responses Following Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Exercise with Autoregulated and Non-Autoregulated Pressure Application
Read the record
Journal article · 2023
Acute effect of low-load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction on oxidative stress biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Read the record
Journal article · 2023
Acute Responses in Blood Flow Restriction Low-intensity Aerobic Training: A Meta-analysis
Read the record
Apply the research
From the paper to the patient
Every protocol in The Complete BFR Certification cites the literature it came from, including this line of work. The module-by-module bibliography (Bonus 5) maps each claim back to its paper.

