Occlusion pressure and blood pressure adaptations following low-load blood flow restriction training versus moderate-load training: a pilot randomized clinical trial in patients with knee osteoarthritis
Frontiers in Physiology · 2025 · Vol 16 · 1693341
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick · Co-author
Abstract
Objective. This pilot study investigated potential adaptations in limb occlusion pressure (LOP) and compared LOP between low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) and traditional moderate-load training (ML) over 9 weeks in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Secondarily, we compared systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) adaptations between these groups.
Methods. Seventeen KOA patients were randomly assigned to the LL-BFR or ML groups. The LL-BFR group performed 75 repetitions (10% 1RM; 60% of LOP). The ML group performed 24 repetitions (60% 1RM; 10% [SHAM] of LOP). In both groups, exercises involving LOP were bilateral hack machine squat and knee extension exercises. LOP, SBP, and DBP were measured before and every 3 weeks until the ninth training week.
Results. After 9 weeks, there were no statistically significant changes in LOP, SBP, or DBP within or between groups. LOP decreased by -32.9 mmHg (95% CI: -68.9 to 3.2) in LL-BFR and -17.2 mmHg (95% CI: -49.0 to 14.6) in ML, achieving clinical significance [relative error variance (REV) = 14.6 mmHg]. SBP decreased by -7.5 mmHg (95% CI: -15.6 to 0.6) in LL-BFR and -1.1 mmHg (95% CI: -8.2 to 6.0) in ML. DBP decreased by -3.7 mmHg (95% CI: -9.2 to 1.7) in LL-BFR and -1.9 mmHg (95% CI: -6.8 to 2.9) in ML.
Conclusion. We observed a non-significant trend toward a reduction in LOP following 9 weeks of LL-BFR in patients with KOA, with a mean point estimate that exceeded a pre-defined threshold for clinical significance, although the wide confidence intervals indicate substantial uncertainty. Furthermore, SBP and DBP showed no significant changes, and no group differences emerged across outcomes. Practically, these findings suggest that LOP remains stable throughout a rehabilitation program, potentially reducing the burden of frequent LOP reassessment in clinical LL-BFR applications.
Trial registration. https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-6pcrfm/
Authors
Mikhail Santos Cerqueira, Rafael Pereira, Daniel Germano Maciel, Cláudia Thais Pereira Pinto, Nicholas Rolnick, Wouber Hérickson de Brito Vieira
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick’s contribution: Co-author
Keywords
- Pain
- Resistance Training
- Arterial Hypertension
- Kaatsu Training
- Vascular Occlusion Exercise
Read the full paper
Cite this paper
Mikhail Santos Cerqueira, Rafael Pereira, Daniel Germano Maciel, Cláudia Thais Pereira Pinto, Nicholas Rolnick, Wouber Hérickson de Brito Vieira. (2025). Occlusion pressure and blood pressure adaptations following low-load blood flow restriction training versus moderate-load training: a pilot randomized clinical trial in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Frontiers in Physiology, 16, 1693341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1693341
Related research
More from this line of work
Journal article · 2025
Acute safety, cardiovascular, perceptual and neuromuscular responses to autoregulated and non-autoregulated blood flow restriction training during elbow rehabilitation in people with hemophilia
Read the record
Journal article · 2025
Impact of blood flow restriction cuff design on upper body exercise: A randomized crossover trial in resistance-trained adults
Read the record
Journal article · 2024
A quasi-experimental study on the energy expenditure, exercise intensity, and rating of perceived exertion of a male bodybuilding posing training
Read the record
Apply the research
From the paper to the patient
Every protocol in The Complete BFR Certification cites the literature it came from, including this line of work. The module-by-module bibliography (Bonus 5) maps each claim back to its paper.

