Acute safety, cardiovascular, perceptual and neuromuscular responses to autoregulated and non-autoregulated blood flow restriction training during elbow rehabilitation in people with hemophilia
Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025 · Vol 7 · 1587615
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick · Co-author
Abstract
Introduction. Low-load resistance training with concurrent blood flow restriction (BFR) provides strength and hypertrophy benefits to healthy individuals and some clinical populations. This is the first study assessing safety and physiological responses of autoregulated (AUTO) and non-autoregulated (NAUTO) BFR protocols in people with hemophilia (PWH). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the acute safety, cardiovascular, neuromuscular and perceptual responses during AUTO and NAUTO BFR training in PWH.
Methods. Eleven severe PWH under prophylaxis performed two sessions of elbow flexion and extension using elastic bands at 50% of the limb occlusion pressure (LOP) with different BFR settings (AUTO vs. NAUTO). Safety, cardiovascular parameters, rating of perceived exertion, elbow pain and pressure algometry were assessed at different timepoints. High-density surface electromyography activity and its spatial distribution were determined for biceps and triceps brachii.
Results. Both BFR conditions were safe in PWH. AUTO provided a hypotensive and hypoalgesic acute response, albeit without between-group differences. Triceps brachii showed differences in spatial distribution, and greater activity with AUTO in the last 3 cycles of the first 3 sets. Although no major differences were found between both conditions in perceptual responses, AUTO condition increased VAS scores during both exercises. No adverse events were observed.
Conclusions. BFR at 50%LOP during arm exercise with either AUTO or NAUTO appears to be equally safe in PWH, but AUTO showed trends for improved cardiovascular and neuromuscular responses. AUTO produced a hypotensive and hypoalgesic acute post-exercise response, albeit without between-group differences, a greater activation in triceps brachii, and higher values of pain. No serious adverse events were observed.
Authors
Daniel C Ogrezeanu, Andrea Tur-Boned, Nicholas Rolnick, Juan J Carrasco, Carlos Cruz-Montecinos, Joaquín Calatayud, Santiago Bonanad, Sofía Pérez-Alenda
Dr. Nicholas Rolnick’s contribution: Co-author
Keywords
- electromyography
- hemarthrosis
- hemophilia A
- ischemic preconditioning
- resistance training
Read the full paper
Cite this paper
Daniel C Ogrezeanu, Andrea Tur-Boned, Nicholas Rolnick, Juan J Carrasco, Carlos Cruz-Montecinos, Joaquín Calatayud, Santiago Bonanad, Sofía Pérez-Alenda. (2025). Acute safety, cardiovascular, perceptual and neuromuscular responses to autoregulated and non-autoregulated blood flow restriction training during elbow rehabilitation in people with hemophilia. Frontiers in sports and active living, 7, 1587615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1587615
Related research
More from this line of work
Journal article · 2025
Impact of blood flow restriction cuff design on upper body exercise: A randomized crossover trial in resistance-trained adults
Read the record
Journal article · 2025
Occlusion pressure and blood pressure adaptations following low-load blood flow restriction training versus moderate-load training: a pilot randomized clinical trial in patients with knee osteoarthritis
Read the record
Journal article · 2024
A quasi-experimental study on the energy expenditure, exercise intensity, and rating of perceived exertion of a male bodybuilding posing training
Read the record
Apply the research
From the paper to the patient
Every protocol in The Complete BFR Certification cites the literature it came from, including this line of work. The module-by-module bibliography (Bonus 5) maps each claim back to its paper.

